Multiple communities, yes
But spending time and engaging is still a little different.
Most of us tend to lurk sometimes. Thanks for not lurking and commenting as well. Really appreciate it :).
My answer of "more than 60 minutes" also includes my time only reading (and voting) for posts (and comments) in those communities, and not necessarily commenting the entire time. π
Reading with intent to engage counts as well.
A lurker has no intent to interact, which of course is not the case for you.
Now I have to redefine engaging π
I used to have so many "friends" in a traditional social networking site where I have 100+ friends, but when I post something (which can be seen by "friends only"), I usually get zero comments and only a few "reacts". π
One of my "friends" literally told me that while he does spend some time daily on social networking sites, he "only likes scrolling down" (browsing) on social networking sites because he "finds it boring to reply" on either posts or messages. π¬
There actually is a full blown research on the different types of behaviours online. Think is was called the ladder of engagement (engagement pyramid) by the altimeter group
I try to engage in multiple communities and her my target which end up spending more than 60 min all together.
Letβs see how much other people are spending.
!luv 1
View or trade
BEER
.Hey @jeanlucsr, here is a little bit of
BEER
from @pixresteemer for you. Enjoy it!Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your
BEER
.Does engaging in multiple communities in the same day count too? π€π
Yes. Of course! Actually, I will ask a multiple community question tomorrow.
Posted via D.Buzz
If your question applies to people spending time in multiple communities (either with a role or just a guest), I would answer "C) > 60 min". π
Multiple communities, yes
But spending time and engaging is still a little different.
Most of us tend to lurk sometimes. Thanks for not lurking and commenting as well. Really appreciate it :).
Posted via D.Buzz
My answer of "more than 60 minutes" also includes my time only reading (and voting) for posts (and comments) in those communities, and not necessarily commenting the entire time. π
Reading with intent to engage counts as well.
A lurker has no intent to interact, which of course is not the case for you.
Now I have to redefine engaging π
Posted via D.Buzz
I used to have so many "friends" in a traditional social networking site where I have 100+ friends, but when I post something (which can be seen by "friends only"), I usually get zero comments and only a few "reacts". π
I guess the topic plays a big role in it. With the messed up the algorithm a close second.
Posted via D.Buzz
Meanwhile, a "friend" posts a picture of his neighborhood without any caption, and he already gets more than 5 replies. π¬
One of my "friends" literally told me that while he does spend some time daily on social networking sites, he "only likes scrolling down" (browsing) on social networking sites because he "finds it boring to reply" on either posts or messages. π¬
There actually is a full blown research on the different types of behaviours online. Think is was called the ladder of engagement (engagement pyramid) by the altimeter group
Posted via D.Buzz
If I expect engagement from my own posts (at least from my current way of posting), I know it would end up badly. π
I think more than 60 minutes, but I think to be more accurate I should really time it. Time it for a week or so.
Hmm... that would be an interesting experiment.
Posted via D.Buzz
Yeah I forgot to start it, but started today.
I try to engage in multiple communities and her my target which end up spending more than 60 min all together.
Letβs see how much other people are spending.
!luv 1
I think most of us who are active in multiple communities easily spend 60+ minutes a day on Hive indeed.