Why Bitcoin Cannot Be Stopped

avatar

We hear a lot about governments wanting to ban cryptocurrency and when will they step in and crush this entire market?

This is an absurd idea. Anyone who understands what cryptocurrency is along with how it is transmitted will realize that it is impossible to stop any of this. In short, the governments of the world were not designed to deal with this.

As I stated on a number of occasions, governments are heading to the scrap heap, at least the nation-states. It will not happen over night but we can expect the demise of this type of system by the end of this century.

Governments, as they are today, were designed to operate in the physical world. They ruled over people who are in a certain geographic area. This made things very simple. Whoever was within the borders had to adhere to those rules. It was all dependent upon where one popped out of the womb. Essentially, where one landed is what determined which government was in control.

We are no longer in just a physical world. For the past 30 years we have moved into the digital realm. This was a slow process which is accelerating now. To add to this, we are also getting very close to embarking into the virtual world. Thus, we will be operating in many different "realities".

Our governments cannot operate in these arenas. It has repeatedly proven that. The legal, monetary, and economic system is ill-equipped to deal with the variances that comes with these new worlds.

In the private realm, companies that are unable to deal with what is taking place go out of business. Both Blockbuster and Kodak are two companies that were crushed by digitization and a new mode of delivery. Governments, on the other hand, can operate a bit longer than private entities. Nevertheless, there fate is sealed.


Source

Just show of two decades ago, there was a company that was all the rage. Napster sprang onto the scene and created an uproar in the music industry. The company was simply a file sharing company. This set the music industry on its ear. Suddenly, millions of teenagers were sharing files of songs, for free. This really cut into the revenues of the record companies.

They, of course, turned to the legal establishment for help. Copyright laws, after all, were designed to protect them. It was failing.

Long story short, the record companies ended up suing a number of people and getting some judgments against them. They were able to put people on the hook for thousands of dollars. All told, the record companies lost millions. Many of them went out of business. The ones that remained, lost money on recorded music for 16 straight years.

What did Napster do?

It basically enabled two computers (nodes) to share a file between them. It was an application that enable the joining of the two different users, providing a "handshake". Of course, if the one with the file wasn't online, there were others who were seeding the network.

Basically, Napster provided the forum to enable peer-to-peer file sharing.

The problem for that company is that it was centralized. It could be attacked and was. This caused it to have to alter course, one that essentially destroyed the business.

That was not the end of file sharing. A host of others such as Kazaa, Limewire, and more sprang up. Each time the government hit one, another popped up. This is overlooking the fact that the Usenet still exists where, as long as one has a reader, files can be downloaded from there.

At its most basic level, what was shared between the different nodes was nothing more than data. This is a very important point. Because of what took place, the government was completely impotent at stopping it. Their only success was going after the centralized entities.


Source

Which brings us to Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies).

Bitcoin is a decentralized network that performs a similar service to Napster. Here, the network will enable two wallets to interact, with currency sent from one to the other. However, it is vital to remember what this truly is.

It is basically the same system.

We have two nodes that are sharing data in a peer-to-peer fashion. Whether that data is a song or currency, the governments are equally unable to stop it. With decentralized networks, unlike Naptster or Kazaa, there is no company to go after. Thus, their (the governments) one target area is eliminated.

This is why decentralization and distribution is so vital. Anything that is centralized contains a point of vulnerability. It is an attack vector. Decentralized systems, on the other hand, cannot be stopped.

And this is why Bitcoin, along with other cryptocurrencies, are invulnerable to government interference. Outside the centralized exchanges, the tools the government's have are completely worthless. That is because it was not designed to operate in this realm. Therefore, it is the proverbial fish out of water to begin with.

Try to keep this in mind the next time someone claims that the government is going to stop Bitcoin.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
35 comments
avatar

They can try to stop crypto but its way out of their league. They either accept it, or have their governments currency crushed by its usage... There is no middle ground.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They either accept it, or have their governments currency crushed by its usage...

Governments are going to be crushed by the entire digital movement. They were not built to operate within this realm.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes the centralized entities are probably going to be hit very hard. But I see no way to avoid centralized DEXs right now since they tend to be the easiest gateway to turning crypto into fiat and vice-versa. Which means the bank (gateway) will always be a bottle neck until everything is digitalized and we move the banks.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think their plan is less about destroying crypto and more about controlling the avenues and bridges. They are trying to onboard the masses into their centralized and regulated crypto environments, and they are VERY good at it. Things like Paypal and Visa and Coinbase will end up controlling a huge chunk of users. Just thinking out loud though, and I'm no expert.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes that is true since it is their ONLY way to maintain any control. They cannot go after the peer-to-peer stuff since it is outside their reach.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Governments don't like bitcoin because bitcoin takes away their power to rule people. If bitcoin reaches the point of being accepted by everyone, the government will have to negotiate with people if they want to continue to exist.

Some people were upset when tesla stopped accepting bitcoin ... But in my view it doesn't matter, if bitcoin reaches the masses who will need to accept bitcoin whether they want to or not, it will be the companies...


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Governments don't like bitcoin because bitcoin takes away their power to rule people.

This is true although it is bigger than just Bitcoin. They do not like the entire digital peer-to-peer arena since it takes away their control.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Reminds me of Pomps unstoppable code lecture years ago...
I agree that companies with offices and directors can be targeted and subdued, but distributed networks are nearly impossible to stop!
I tweeted this article and added #POSH perhaps the OCD curator will show some love :)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great analogy comparing Bitcion with Napster. I'll be using that in conversations with my less informed friends. 😂

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great. I hope your friends are a bit older since the young ones will not even know what Napster is (or a record company for that matter). LOL

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

or a record company for that matter

True. I actually remember my son asking me what a record was, before vinyl became popular again. 😂

!ENGAGE 10

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

This post underlines once again your own narrative that it's pointless to try and fight technology. They seem to find the energy to do so, or at least pretend on doing that. I really hope their CBDCs will fail...

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well they do it for two reasons.

  • it is all they know so they believe they are in control of it all

  • they are fighting for their own survival, whether they realize it or not.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh man, I remember Napster, Kazaa, and Limewire. It was such a bummer when they got shut down. Good thing I was still kicking around on iirc that I could get pretty much anything I wanted. I think looking at the music industry is a really smart parallel to the crypto space. Would you consider streaming services like Spotify now are like centralized exchanges?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Would you consider streaming services like Spotify now are like centralized exchanges?

Yeah they are akin to it. They are centralized entities that control the flow of audio and determine who has access (for a price). That is the epitome of a Web 2.0 company.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is what I was thinking too. I just wanted to make sure my head was in the right space.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well in reality they have effective tactics to stop bitcoin in it's tracks the real question is why haven't they rolled them out. You'll be surprised how quickly people would fold if the government spun a story about dangers of bitcoin and terrorism and illegal activities and started locking folks up. People locked up seemingly change their minds quickly.

I think the most likely scenario was the government deduced that this technology was here now. The best way to handle the situation is like they always do. Allow people to keep thinking they free. Ideas of freedom and its probably likely the cia has control of companies, tons of bitcoin and so they can shift things as they like and probably keep a tab on other countries using bitcoin.

That's the likely scenario otherwise you're talking about a national security threat. So i certainly believe the government would be that calm to that unless they already had a pretty good handle on things. The real issue would be facebook libracoin which is why they got hammered by the us government for even thinking about launching a crypto. Keep in mind they hadn't even started one yet. They just thought about it lol. So no way the government would let bitcoin be successful.. not even a chance in the slightest. The only way this could be done properly is changing the entire structure of the value system which is the usd and other major fiat currencies to the point people see currencies and how they value them totally differen't than now. As long as our value systems are closer to theirs they will always be able to control the future of our money.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

That might be true but I see their system of narrative of control breaking down. The MSM is being trusted less with each passing day. The number of people who think they are a joke is growing. Politicians are not be exposed for the frauds they always were, yet many still believed in them for some reason. And the banking system is coming under threat from the technology sector.

So I disagree. The tools at their disposal in the passed are no longer effective. Just look at how inept they are at "managing" the economy. Technology that was Sci-Fi a few decades ago and we still have anemic global growth.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's certainly been progress in technology that can allow for future changes. However i think its a bit.. put it this way the government hasn't even begun to fight yet. A full out intiative i think would tell a different story. For the government to get going it would be as easy as they fight those fake wars and you see how creative they can be about the reasons why.

So my honest opinion is the us government is not remotely concerned about bitcoin. I believe they know something we don't. Bitcoin is probably likely to fail anyway.. Blockchain tech i mean who knows what can come out of blockchain tech in the future.

Bitcoin is a complete joke though. It's just another banking product, next to cd's at the local bank branch office. It's not a revolution the people who should have it don't even have any. So i'm not convinced yet lol.

In some possible future a product may emerge but i can tell you this. it won't be smooth sailing like btc has been.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Try to keep this in mind the next time someone claims that the government is going to stop Bitcoin.

It looks like that some governments and central banks lose their power. It will cause the reduction of political position. It is important for some cryptocurrency activists to go on politic so that they can control the policy of the financial system.

In the worst situation, when governments want to ban bitcoin and cryptocurrency, they spend too much energy on that action. Instead of banning that is impossible to be banned, I think governments should embrace cryptocurrency developers to create platforms that are more friendly to cryptocurrency and compliant to the regulations.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Plus Bitcoin is not the only game in town. There are a ton of other cryptocurrencies popping up each day, in all forms. They are in gaming, art, and anywhere people can think of.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

in the short term governments can make life harder for people to use bitcoin in their respective countries but that doesn't matter from a global perspective

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah and getting all governments to agree is not going to happen. We will see some that embrace it simply because another does not.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Suddenly, millions of teenagers were sharing files of songs, for free.

Hey, I was 40 something and increasing my music library quite extensively. Of course no one has ever really accused me of acting grown-up. ;)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, Napster is an interesting example. Not only because of what came after, but also what was there before: people (or I at least) have been sharing music on tapes for years before mp3 came around. We taped songs from the radio, copied music from other tapes, even taped entire CDs to share with friends. Many people even sold those tapes on the street! And it was all normal... While this was going on for years, the music industry didn't bat an ear (probably because there was little they could do). But once it all went digital, using the speed and efficiency of the internet to continue doing the same thing as always, suddenly they started suing... because there was someone they could sue: Napster. Not much later, thanks to decentralization, things went back to normal... except at a much greater volume. Which goes to show: they can try to impose regulations, but essentially they can't stop the free market.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think you hit the nail on the head. The speed which it started was amazing. It was impossible to stop but it accelerated beyond what they thought.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

The government will keep on trying to stop crypto but they have failed in handling their duties. I feel people will see the light and stand for their right when it comes to decision making as regards their money

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah they keep trying and will persist. It is not going to subside. That is why we need to be equally diligent in what we do. We are not able to stop anytime soon.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000