X is becoming a “pay to speech” platform with new tiered subscription based system

avatar
(Edited)

4095FC60-ED4A-4189-8CBC-CD42FF6E7B06.jpeg
Hi guys! So, Platform X has rolled out this tiered subscription model, and at first glance, it seems like they're trying to get rid of the annoying bots on the platform. But if you look closer, you'll see it's creating a sort of pay-to-play scene. Now, if you can shell out 16 bucks a month, you get more eyeballs on your content. It's becoming less about what you say and more about how much you can pay to say it. Let’s delve in.

It's tiptoeing on a slippery slope towards a pay-to-play model. Just recently, they rolled out a new tiered system, $3 for basic, $8 for premium and $16 for premium plus per month tier which boasts of an extra boost. It's straightforward—the more money you shell out, the more eyeballs on your content. It's shaping up to be a modern-day caste system, with the content from people who can't pay up being shoved under the rug.

Now, I get the intent behind this; it's aimed at putting a leash on the rampant bot issue plaguing the platform. Bots have turned X into a wild west of spam, and it's about time someone took the reins. But is slapping a price tag the right way to go about it? Hmmmn I have my reservations.

Here's the thing, just the other day, I was reporting about how bots on X are shelling out $8 for verification checks. They're still spamming the living daylights out of the platform, either because they have excess money to burn or because the returns on their spammy endeavors are worth the investment. Now, with this new multi-tiered subscription, X aims to combat bots, but I'm not sold on its effectiveness. To me, it's shaping up to be less of an anti-bot measure and more of a speech restriction system.

66D8E9D8-87BF-40EB-8304-21C87A8012C6.jpeg

Let's dissect this a bit. There's no solid guarantee that this fee will deter bot farms or cut down their activities. If anything, it seems to have made it more appealing to be a verified spammer or bot. With a premium subscription, your content gets a front-row seat, scammer, bot or not. It's a flawed system that, in essence, equates financial capability with legitimacy. If you can afford the highest subscription, you're legit, and your voice gets amplified over those on lower subscription tiers. The system's got it all twisted.

And let's not brush over the huge elephant in the room—the glaring inequality this system perpetuates. Take, for instance, folks from Nigeria, where the minimum wage hovers around $30. How are they expected to cough up $16 every month just to have their voices heard? It's a slap in the face to low-income earners and regions where $16 is a big deal. This model automatically mutes these voices in favor of those who can easily afford the premium subscription.

The core of the issue is that what was once a free platform for expression is morphing into a playground for the financially endowed. The beauty of social platforms is the democratization of voices, where every Joe and Jane can share their thoughts without a paywall stifling them. But with this tiered subscription model, X is straying far from this ideal.

It's not looking good, especially when you factor in the far-reaching implications. This pay-to-play model doesn't just impact individual users; it reshapes the entire discourse on the platform. It sets up a scenario where the narrative is controlled by those with deeper pockets, drowning out the diversity of thought that makes social platforms vibrant.

Furthermore, it's worth considering alternative solutions to the bot problem that don't hinder free speech or place a financial burden on users. Some platforms have employed sophisticated algorithms to identify and restrict bot activities, while others have leveraged community-driven moderation systems. Personally, I lean towards community driven moderation systems where reputation is key.

This venture into a tiered subscription model is a shaky move that threatens to erode the essence of free expression on the platform. It's a model that favors the haves over the have-nots, and that's a dangerous game to play. Sure, the bot problem needs fixing, but this ain't it. The fight against bots shouldn't come at the cost of silencing genuine voices struggling to afford a seat at the table.

Kindly share your thoughts below.

Thanks for reading.

header image was generated by Ai

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
14 comments
avatar

I just want to follow a few interesting people on twitter, but instead I spend most of the time trying to block the bots that have recently added me.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The bots infest replies, they spam with phishing links that some people fall into and loose private data, they are a menace and should be stopped, but they’ve proven that money can’t stop them

0
0
0.000
avatar

Currently X I find it useful for sharing my posts that I make on HIVE, but if I have to pay I probably won't use it anymore

0
0
0.000
avatar

I find X useful for a lot of things actually. Sharing links is also one of them but with this payment structure, your links will be as good as throwing it into an abyss if you’re not a paid user because it’s most likely that no one will find it

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for replying to me and giving me your opinion about it. In the next few weeks we will see how to continue with X

0
0
0.000
avatar

I would add that Bots in social media and gaming are still something I don't understand well. I don't understand their presence, but paying to have a social profile is something I understand even less

0
0
0.000
avatar

On social media, some are just a nuisance, while others spam post replies with phishing links and many people fall for them, some people get hacked through them and others loose sensitive data. So bots are a menace on social media and I understand why they need to be stopped.

Paying to have a social profile, sigh, what’s even worse is paying to have your voice heard in a social community, that’s something I don’t understand

0
0
0.000
avatar

That explains why I currently see posts from people I don't know from Adam. It means they paid more to get the front roll.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah exactly….and same reason why others without the check mark don’t get any visibility

0
0
0.000
avatar

I saw this as well recently. Intitially a couple months back with the $7 registration I thought it would be optional to do so, but now with these next tiers coming in. It doesnt make sense to get the 3 bucks one already.

Although 16 bucks is still nothing crazy. It used to be nice that there was a sort of organically following built up by the big names but that feels totally gone now. If x (sorry i still say twitter) didnt have so much free alpha to read on crypto stuff I would be long gone

0
0
0.000
avatar

I’m also there for the free alpha and a little chance I build a web2 audience that will become 3

0
0
0.000