RE: Why quality content is not always rewarded on Hive?
(Edited)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I agree that success in the meaning of high upvotes is only possible if you know the right people, those with the 'big upvotes' but if it's true it doesn't matter what you write, what your text look like I say: why bother?
Why write yourself, why fight those who use AI and so on?
By the way, I interact a lot, I host a contest and commend, upvote and read each post not once but even 2 to 3 times. This contest only takes me over 20 hours a week!
Guess how many of all those people ever read, commented and/or upvoted me?
🍀❤️
0
0
0.000
Unfortunately there are some instances where this has become true and I think it's very bad for hive. Effort and quality content should get more rewards than simple posts that have 10 words on them. That's why we should all take part in the process and do some manual upvoting.
To me, it's not about the only ten words. Some people can say more in ten words than others in 1500. A haiku does not count many words but is this bad content? Does repeating the same sentences about 12 times just to reach the minimum of words make a text good?
Most people hate reading, they are not writers plus many do not have access to the internet 24/7.
Each week I read a few entries that might look bad (mainly because of how it is edited but although short the 'story' is good.
Those people should be motivated just like good writers. There are many great storytellers but what is upvoted is mainly the same.
I think it's hard to change that or like you said to find these people. It's time-consuming to search for good content.
Thanks for the talk.
🍀❤️