RE: Why OCD is the new Curie
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I don't monitor what these projects do, but some people seem to get a vote from one of them just about every time. I would think they should spread the love around. I did see OCD have about $400 to a recent post! I do get the odd Curie vote, but I do okay. Some people just seem to be favoured by other big accounts without ever asking for it. There's also rogues like rancho. If he's still controlled by 'H' then I will never get a vote from him :)
I noticed we lost a whale this week, but I don't know which. They must still be an orca. We need more dolphins and orcas to spread the votes around. As Hive grows the big accounts will only be able to support a fraction of the good content.
0
0
0.000
I am guessing there are a handful that probably seem like they get hit more frequently than others. Curie was the same way back in the day. There were definite favorites. I think a lot of that goes back to it being manual curation and just the nature of the human psyche. People like patterns. Sometimes subconsciously.
Yes, but if it is pointed out to them and they keep doing it then it is favouritism :)
I upvote you all the time though, I think that would be favoritism, but is it necessarily bad? As long as they are still spreading their vote around...
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I think each of us has friends they upvote, but if you have a really large vote then it would be nice to spread the benefits. There is the issue of having the time to do that or whether you automate it somehow. I find the thought of being able to give out huge votes a little scary :)
Like I said, I don't see the problem as long as they are spreading it out a little bit. If my account ever gets huge, I want to be able to pay you and a handful of others back for all the support I have gotten through the years. If that handful of people are the only ones I am upvoting though, then something is definitely wrong.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta