3 Steps of Hive Governance

avatar
(Edited)


Witness Votes

Hive is a governance token and as a benefit of building Hive Power, this gives us a voice in the governance of Hive and you can exercise this governance in a few ways. The first thing you can do is to vote for Hive Witnesses who run the Hive nodes and produce new blocks. Each person gets 30 witness votes and you can vote for them. The strength of your vote is based on your available Hive Power, therefore, the more Hive you have powered up, the bigger your vote for that witness.

The rewards for running a Hive node are quite skewed to those in the top 20 witnesses and therefore it is the goal of many witnesses to be in the top 20 as that is where the money is so to say. Being in the top 20 pays around 10k Hive to a noderunner if my memory serves me rightly. Overall, witnesses were paid 3,3M Hive last year according to the latest figures by Dalz.

Where does the reward come from? It is coming from Hive inflation, so the transactions on Hive are not technically free, they are paid for by all Hive Power holders. However, they perform an important function and it makes sense to reward people who keep Hive running well. They have server costs to cover after all and it is some important work for the blockchain. The inflation part paid to witnesses is however small in comparison to the overall inflation.

image.png


I am not usually voting too much in the top20 as my vote would not make too much difference there, but I do consider to vote around the witness 20 mark as there is all to play for there and my HP could make a little difference here.

Some things that I consider are the reputation of the witness, the stability of the node, their technical knowledge, do they grow their account, do they upvote comments, HBD% and maybe how are some of the projects they are involved in working.

Other than that, there could be many smaller up and coming witnesses who are working hard and could do with your support and I usually like to look out for them and give them a vote because this helps with decentralisation of Hive. Governance is very important and it is therefore important to exercise your vote if you want to inact positive change on Hive.

DHF Proposals

The second way to exercise governance on Hive is by upvoting (or not) DAO proposals. This is where the Hive Decentralised Hive Fund would then support projects that help the Hive eco-system. Here you can look through any projects that you think deserve some support and exercise your vote. When considering to support a proposal, I am considering the reputation of the team, their track record and if this benefits the Hive community in some way.

image.png


Currently, at the time of writing, the DHF is paying out 16 886 HBD per day or 500 980 HBD per month! That equates to just over 6 million per year! 6 071 760 to be precise! You might ask where does the money come from? It is coming again from all Hive Power holders through inflation and usually this 17k HBD is converted each day to Hive and sold. Therefore, it is important to be sure about supporting a project before you vote on it. Along with the HBD%, this has a negative effect on the value of Hive unless the project really does bring value to Hive and is important infrastructure.

To see the overall impact the DAO is currently having on Hive token holders, the daily Hive inflation should be around 70k Hive according to the figures by Dalz, and 17k HBD in proposals works out at 47k Hive sold each day at todays prices to support these projects. This is more than half the expected Hive daily inflation. If we compare the performance of the Hive DAO to say a similar project paying $500k per month, OpenSATS, there they are supporting 21 Dapps with just 40% of those funds. Hive is currently focused more on marketing than developing at the moment, so we have less Dapps supported.

Delegation

The third way to exercise your governance on Hive is to actually upvote and curate good content on Hive and reward people for their effort. This will then help attract people to Hive and they would want to stick around. Delegating too much of your Hive then means Hive becomes more centralised and just a few people decide what is good content or not.

The great thing about Hive is that it is decentralised and the choice is yours. Each person can decide how much they want to be involved in the governance and things like curation.

Closing Words

The important thing to having good governance on Hive is that it affects the reputation of Hive and this in turn motivates whether people would like to come to Hive or not. If we support witnesses and influencers who do not do the best for Hive or corrupt DHF proposals, people can see this, if not through the grapevine, definetly through the price of Hive.

Do you take part in governance on Hive?

mypathtofire divider.jpg

Credits:

Title image created with clipart used und canva pro license and Hive logo.

Screenshots from source and source

mypathtofire divider.jpg

Let's connect : mypathtofire



0
0
0.000
20 comments
avatar

!DHEDGE
!ALIVE
!discovery 20
@tipu curate

0
0
0.000
avatar

@mypathtofire! You Are Alive so I just staked 0.1 $ALIVE to your account on behalf of @ libertycrypto27. (4/10)

The tip has been paid for by the We Are Alive Tribe through the earnings on @alive.chat, feel free to swing by our daily chat any time you want, plus you can win Hive Power (2x 50 HP) and Alive Power (2x 500 AP) delegations (4 weeks), and Ecency Points (4x 50 EP), in our chat every day.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @mypathtofire! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the week.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

Hive Power Up Day - February 1st 2024
0
0
0.000
avatar

Very good explanation mate, I have heard several people saying that sending a witness vote outside the top 20 makes a bigger impact and supports decentralization.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes. I also think we need some new ideas and this can come from up and coming witnesses.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hmm
Thanks for making this note especially on delegation
So it is better to delegate your Hive to just a few people right?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think it makes sense to not deleage more than 20% of your Hive power out if you are a content producer and want to grow your account.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great post! Unfortunately many on hive believe that governance is the resort of the whales. I believe that even small holders should take this role seriously and participate in governance. Leaving this to whales only favorises the gap between the small and the big holders which actually undermines decentralisation.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree, even though the votes are based on HP, the number of people supporting things is also very important and has a role to play.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great explanation! Learnt something new from it as I didn't had the impression that voting for witnesses outside of the Top 20 can carry more impact and contributes more to decentralization. I think governance is an important aspect of Hive that we should learn and play a part.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks, taking part in the onchain governance is a great thing that we have on Hive.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Good write up. I'd argue the DHF needs a serious change. As it stands, blocktrades can pass almost anything by himself. We need to consider both how to make the voting process a little more fair and there need to be more requirements on people who get DHF funding to prove they are using the funds well, as opposed to now where some get funding and then don't do anything.

But anyway, all good stuff! That reminds me I need to take a look at my witness votes and adjust them.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I agree, I think there should also be a further layer of governance regarding DHF funds. In particular there are no goals or strategy for use of the funds, no real requirements for milestones or achievements etc. At least not publicly that I have seen. The example I gave of OpenSATS manages to support 21 Dapps with just 40% of the funds we use, which says alot, and that ecosystem is growing rapidly.

0
0
0.000