RE: Automation Stepping Up Due To COVID

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Robots get all the work, humans get UBI, except programmers; they have to program robots.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

hive-167922 leofinance
0
0
0.000
4 comments
avatar

Not exactly its more likely robots in the near future will be self programming as well as self replicating. So they'll be smarter and more equipped to program themselves than human coders i believe.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I bet it would be some programming job left to humans. Assembly maybe; have to have some kind of opcode to generate interrupt.

Human will not lose all control over all process. Just in case, you know sky net type of catastrophic situation.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

As was stated below, it is likely the need for wide spread coders will be reduced by the end of this decade. We already see self coding AI which will only become more prevalent in the future.

There was a thought that being in the "creative" field was a safe bet; a common thought 5 years ago. Now we see this is no longer the case as AI is showing it can be creative too.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I agree the amount of coders needed would be reduced. But I also believe there will be more for any core designs, or a hybrid approach in the future.

AI is perfect for repetitive work; making variant changes from original of something.

AI does not make sure 100% correct, their way of solving problems is to use millions of historical records. It's like Asian/Chinese medical practice. There is no scientific approve for many treatments, it just has done the same way for thousands of years, and it works.

That being said, it can produce inaccuracy. If we write a machine learning logarithm, we aim at a really high number of probability that the result is correct. Let's say if we got something lower than 10% correct, we just invert the logarithm to make that high (over simplification here).

But never 100%, because that's not how we train ML.

There is always something the machine needs human, and/or vise versa.

I'm not saying AI cannot do what human wants them to do. They can beat human in chess, go, any other high logical, creativity required games. They can do it.

But, again, there are some uniqueness that human brain has, that machine just cannot do yet (keyword yet). It might take very long time.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply