Reasons Why SEC Might Not Approve Bitcoin Spot ETF's
what if, they don't approve it? Do you got any backup plan or have a second thought on this? I guess didn't and I've spent a lot of time thinking what could be possible reason it won't get approved and to find out those you need to read it.
Bitcoin Spot ETFs Filled and Progress so far
Many of Bitcoin Spot ETF's have been filed since last two months including BlackRock world largest assets manager worth $9 Trillion is included with 5 others.
They all are got approved by SEC which is a first Good outcome.. now they'll review it in the coming time and we all will know if it's going to be rejected or passed.
So far, Bloomberg Analysts see a 65% chance a U.S. spot bitcoin ETF will launch this year, up from 50% previously ~ source.
And what could be 35% other reason it might get rejected? Let's talk about that ahead.
1. US and China: Politics Behind ETFs
Since the Beginning of this year we've seen US being anti Crypto while China being more friendly and opening gates for investors.
Now these Bitcoin Spot ETF's in US brings some politics into this matter. The possible reason to expect less is US will simply not let ETFs get approved due to the fresh cash flow, money it will bring into the market.
Bitcoin Spot ETFs Could Bring $30B in New Demand, Crypto Trader NYDIG Says. ~ source.
And I see china have more upper hand on crypto nowadays.. make me believe US won't let those tradfi investors or wall street money flows into crypto at any cost.
On the other hand; US government clearly said they're going to sell Bitcoins in coming time while also they want to have more control in the market and trying to shake out things.
So what could be the other reason?
SEC is Still Going After Crypto Exchanges
This is one of thing I've been watching lately since "XRP Isn't a security" Garry is bringing baseless statement against crypto and they've been going more harsh on CEX exchanges.
Like SEC said to CEO of Coinbase to delist all coins except Bitcoin and I think there's a bullish side of this statement "maybe sec is planning to approve ETF" that could be only reason why they want other coins to get delist and Bitcoin stays like that since ETFs and Coinbase is going to be a gateway to it and they don't want other coins to get more traction but this is just my assumption.
SEC is anti Crypto for sure who don't want any exchange to lead and they're already chasing binance, Coinbase at the same time if anything goes wrong in the coming time before ETFs launch they might not approve it based on those events.
Wrapping Up...
This is why I believe there's still chances ETFs won't get approved as you can also see Bloomberg Analysts also said "65%" chances of ETFs getting launch and the other 35% could be based on thing's I've shared above.
Also there are some news sources creating speculation about $ETH ETFs is coming but correct time will reveal it.
I'd be glad to know your thoughts or perspective behind this and feel free to share your possible reason behind Bitcoin Spot ETFs getting rejected in comment.
Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha
https://leofinance.io/threads/idksamad78699/re-idksamad78699-25hbar6qb
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people ( idksamad78699 ) sharing the post on LeoThreads,LikeTu,dBuzz.
I’ve also explored the thought of them saying a no but I think it is unlikely, the worst they’ll do is drag it out
Yea, drag it out and wait for something bad to happen in market.. they're already on it I guess.
!PIZZA
Congratulations @idksamad78699! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 15000 comments.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
To support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Check out our last posts:
I have also read some opinions saying Bitcoin ETFs are less likely to get approved. Will be interesting to see how it goes. SEC is a pain in the arse, lol!
By the way, thanks for using LeoGlossary. I recommend linking in each of the keywords once only. I read it isn't good for SEO when done repetitively :) For example, if you linked "crypto" already in the first paragraph, no need to repeat linking again in other parts of your article. 😉
Yea, as long as this current peeps exist in SEC it will be like that.
Oh, I thought it work well if you use it multiple time in "Keywords". Thanks for letting me know.
!PIZZA !LUV
@ifarmgirl-leo, @idksamad78699(1/1) sent LUV. | connect | community | HiveWiki | NFT | <>< daily
! help
(no space) to get help on Hive. InfoAs long as Gensler is there, lol!
I read google punishes repetitive links. Not sure though but it will be interesting to experiment :)
Haha yeah!
Will do take care in future.. gotta try different experiments to see how Thing's work. Hehe!.
$PIZZA slices delivered:
idksamad78699 tipped mistakili
@idksamad78699(2/5) tipped @ifarmgirl-leo
SEC was never crypto-friendly any time and it still doing the same thing from the beginning. 35% means huge. I think even if it was 1% I would love to believe in the 1%. Let's wait for the news. I think in that time 35% will be turned into 100%.
fact: I don't trust SEC .
Indeed, they're being more harsh than my ex 😂 jk (I ain't got one).
Same, same!
Neither do I.. I hope it get launched cuz that will be so good for market!
😂😂🤣🤣🤣.
Tell me when you get one😂.
!LOL
lolztoken.com
I understand they're really marking headlines.
Credit: reddit
@idksamad78699, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of intishar
(1/1)
ENTER @WIN.HIVE'S DAILY DRAW AND WIN HIVE!