They're Here, They're Ready, and They All Miss a Key Ingredient

avatar

While early in its history crypto was ignored, I believe it's been many years now since it's not. More years than most of us can think of.

There is a fundamental difference between people involved in crypto (including many of the crypto businesses) and banks or traditional social media, which we may dream to disrupt.

They generally don't fall prey to FUD and FOMO, they create and use them in their favor.

FUD started to become ineffective in the crypto winters, but don't tell me what Gensler was doing didn't get to you even a little bit! And while you followed the SEC news, did you see Blackrock, Fidelity and Citadel coming? I didn't, although after a while I suspected he might be a Wall Street pawn. I have some comments on the blockchain to proof it, lol.

They will not be the only banks and financial entities to get involved with crypto. Some already did it while others announced they will and the rest of them will follow suite.

Regarding traditional social media, let's not think they will roll over and die while we will take over. They won't.

Remember Meta's Diem, that was planned to be launched in 2020?

From the wiki page we found out that

Morgan Beller started working on cryptocurrency and blockchain at Meta in 2017

Notice the year? One year after the legacy chain of Hive was created. It's true, at the time, this guy was the only one working at the project. But less than 2 years later, they already had 50 engineers.

I don't know if after their Diem project got killed they still pursue this direction actively, or they went full into AI now (going through the metaverse first).

Now we have Elon Musk at Twitter making some bold changes for its business model. His dream is to make Twitter the "biggest financial institution in the world", by adding the financial component to the platform, something that Hive had since inception. But he had the idea, apparently, from the Chinese application WeChat.

One thing neither Twitter nor Facebook are interested in is decentralization.


Source

As issues like the recent protest from Reddit showed, centralized control/decision may not have a future where communities are involved, and social media platforms are such places.

This is where they will likely fail because they can add some sort of currencies on their platforms, but they will not relinquish control and a top-down decision process.

And in the end, if someone has a social media account that can be banned is one thing, but if that is tied to a direct monetary value, it's another.

Hive is a constant reminder that enough decentralization is possible to ensure account ownership (with all associated content and assets), while also having a good and battle-tested method of widely distributing inflation to users. Maybe that's why Hive is always "forgotten" from conversations. Many other blockchains are on route to centralization, so they won't be a problem anymore.

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha



0
0
0.000
21 comments
avatar

Nice, Elon Musk has great idea to make their platform more valuable. thanks for the updating..

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's not a new idea. The difference is he is like a bull: once started he keeps going. He sees something worth it and is not afraid of making big changes that will upset many who like stability. A disruptive person, that's why he is involved in all these innovative industries.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Elon musk never disappoint

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm not a fan of him as a person. But he is smart and has results tackling complicated problems.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hive is a true definition of decentralization. it has achieved it by fighting big players in the market.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, I guess it is a passive fight if your content on their platforms (Twitter for sure) is (was?) shadowbanned.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's still a centralized application and it's his dream of an X app. I don't really know if AI will be enough given the accuracy but maybe it can get there in the future. I honestly think I prefer Hive instead though.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes. My point was that we only have one key advantage compared to them, imo: decentralization and the benefits that come from it: account and assets ownership and censorship resistance. Maybe our type of inflation distribution is hard to copy and adapt elsewhere too, or others would have succeded already in doing that.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yea. I think there isn't anything that is better than decentralization because it can't easily be taken down or controlled.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Couldn't agree more. Yes, applications can be centralized (and in many cases is better to be so), but the layer they are built on must be decentralized for all the reasons we started to understand as we are living and growing it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am betting Hive is unique. That's why I'm here rather than trading the big, sexy cryptos. !BBH

0
0
0.000
avatar

@gadrian! Your Content Is Awesome so I just sent 1 $BBH (Bitcoin Backed Hive) to your account on behalf of @fiberfrau. (1/5)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hive is unique, that's true. And as unsexy as it may seem to others, I'm also focused on Hive.

0
0
0.000
avatar

. . . did you see Blackrock, Fidelity, and Citadel coming?

I didn't see them coming too.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep. I think nobody that wasn't close to the matter saw this coming, even if at some point we might've suspected Gensler was putting on the whole show for the benefit of Wall Street.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, that's what we read now that Gensler is hurting the small guys for the sake of the big guys in Wall Street. Don't know if there is truth in it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I guess time will either reveal the truth or bury it and people will forget.

0
0
0.000