RE: Why to create a special account for a particular tribe ?

avatar
(Edited)

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Crypto decentralization simply means taking away power from a single type of entity. Uh, not governments, but banks and "tax-free" megacorps. But there is always some form of governance anywhere you go.


Posted via proofofbrain.io



0
0
0.000
12 comments
avatar

Governments now control all those fields as well. So, by saying governments, I meant all those as well !

0
0
0.000
avatar

Eh, I can't see it that way. Governments are controlled by bankers and megacorps, not the other way around. I think having people blaming "governments" is something bankers and megacorps want you to do, so they can get away with their crap while politicians serve as sock puppets.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They are all related anyway. The main beneficiary is not the citizen for sure !

0
0
0.000
avatar

ANARCHY = NO KINGS
ANARCHY = DEMOCRACY
ANARCHY = NO PRIESTS NO PROPHETS NO OLIGARCHS
ANARCHY = NO "LEADERS" ONLY "PUBLIC SERVANTS"

ANARCHY = BLOCKCHAIN
ANARCHY = HOLACRACY
ANARCHY = TRANSPARENCY
ANARCHY = PROCRUSTEAN LAW

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are leaders though, they're just a lot harder to see. I.e, the main leadership behind BTC decided to turn keep things as they were, but people who opposed them forked the coin into BCH. Why did the opposite not happen? Why wasn't the BCH side of the fork keeping the original name of the coin? Because they were not the main group. The same thing happens with every coin. They always have their own leaders.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The idea is that everyone is forced to abide by the same set of transparent rules.

In BTC, that means that each miner gets to vote on what version they will run.

It also means that anyone can fork the chain if they want.

0
0
0.000
avatar

each miner

mining is centralized

0
0
0.000
avatar

how is mining centralized ?

0
0
0.000
avatar
  1. there are only a handful of mining pools. this will only make sense if you understand the influence they have
  2. very few people do most of the mining. like when one city had a blackout in china but that instantly cut mining power by over 30%
0
0
0.000
avatar

sure.

but 30% is not exactly "centralized"

there is no "king of bitcoin" who can act unilaterally

you don't have to fill out any forms or ask anyone for permission to set up your own mining rig

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

but 30% is not exactly "centralized"

yeah it's not like 30% of all mining power belonging to a single person is meaningful, you are right, it's obviously my mistake. that doesn't say anything about this issue at all

I mean even if we could attribute 97% of all power to four or five people, that obviously wouldn't be centralized, amiright? because centralized means something entirely different. I realize that's the case with bitcoin because of pools, but that doesn't change anything. do you know why? this is why:

because what's reaaaaally important is how I don't have to fill out any forms if I want to mine. now it all makes sense! it's only centralized if we have to fill out forms! if we don't have to fill out forms, then it's not centralized!!

that's where the magic lies! it doesn't matter what anyone says, ever, simply because there is no form-filling involved! yeees now I see it

110%

0
0
0.000