LeoFinance Is Too Good And I Can't Curate It All
For the last few months on leofinance I've had a huge problem. There is so much good content I can't possibly give meaningful curation to it all.
This has been on my mind for a while and curation issues started for me way back on steemit.
I really believe that the curve has been perfected on Leofinance so that we can diversify our vote but I just don't have enough power to keep giving out my 100% votes.
I started thinking about this again last night after I read this article by @shortsegments. (everyone should read it)
It's a very positive piece and when I say this is a problem it's a good problem to have. I would like to be able to just take my combined 3400 Leo power and give 100% votes to the new posts that come out or people that I see who are consistent but undervalued.
It dwindles my vote power enough that I can't really keep up. I mainly make sure that I vote everyone who comments on my posts 100%, and sometimes it'll take 2 or 3 days to make sure that I do it But I seek to do more.
My theory is that encouraging new members of Leofinance is the key to the future. Far easier and cheaper to keep them here as opposed to the cost of onboarding new people.
The whales on here do a great job of this but it is really up to us as the emerging middle class to take the torch and run with this. Because the whales can't do it forever. I only wish my steak was higher but I guess eventually it'll get there. I feel like if I chop up my votes then it won't be encouraging enough for those undervalued posts.
I want everyone to thrive on Leo finance just need to figure out better ways to do it.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I can relate to those things. I have less than 3K LEO power and I want to curate and reward a lot more people than I already do. I don't have enough stake for it right now, but with time, I will grow alongside others who will grow as well. I would rather get and/or give a ~10% vote than being ignored and/or overlooked.. And our ~10% votes combined will make a huge difference in the near future.
That being said, I usually vote with enough voting power so the vote is worth 0.100 LEO in total if- or when I am spreading my votes. Other than that, I go with a percentage of 60-100% on various things.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I have my vote multiplier set to 10 so I give out 10% leo votes with 100% of my value while only using 10% of my hive power.
So the $ amount of my vote is always 100%. And I vote 100% with my curation account.
I may have to go a little smaller on my curation account though. I just need more Leo lol
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
ohh man i feel you. one of the main reasons i want to increase my stake is to give better upvotes to people as i think they deserve more!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
If I imagine its great difficulty when voting, seeing so much quality content, some with few votes ... What you most want is to recognize the effort and dedication of each user ... stay strong
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Loving your positivity in this post. Too much good content is a great problem to have! With any successful content creation site, there will come a time when the traffic is overwhelming and you can't reach every post. The important thing in my opinion is to remain consistent at stay engaged, your best is all you can do after all!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
That's one of the keys to success of Leo. Man think where Leo will be in one year from now, crazy to think about!
Congrats ,you were upvoted from this account because you were in Top 25 engagers yesterday on CTPTalk .
You made a total of 11 comments and talked to 9 different authors .
Your rank is 1 .
For more details about this project please read here - link to announcement post
You can also delegate and get weekly payouts.