Explaining SPS Stacking Range Requirements.

First of all want to star telling you that I play in Gold most of the season and the last days I go to Diamond, my total SPS is 17000 so I'm short with this requirements to get 100% rewards it is not so good for me I was expecting the numbers been higher than 17000 for Gold 1 but there are a lot higher than I would expected.

But I reading lots of people overreacting, that make me think they have not understand 1 or more things of how this change will work, the team should made a post explaining this better, hopefully they will make it soon, meanwhile I will explain it here:

  • It is not a Requirement: You can still play in the range you want having less SPS will just reduce your rewards, having more SPS for your range will increases your rewards.
  • Having 50% of SPS needed will give you 80% of the rewards: There is a bigger table that show this, if you have 20% of the amount requirement you will be earning 50% of the rewards even for getting 90% of the rewards is not that high, when it goes insane is for having the 100% or more of your rewards apparently that is the team strategy making people want they old 100% and put a quite high price for it , but by having any sps stacking you will be getting some rewards.
  • SPS can be rented: you can just rent SPS make some numbers and find what is the most profitable amount to have or rent more to accumulate more rewards cards.
  • This is just their first try if there are problems with it they will change it.
  • Anyone can make a proposal for a better plan.
  • Even with few SPS stacked you will be earning more SPS than before and this one will have a higher value: If you have been stacked your SPS instead of selling it the chances are that you will have more SPS stacking than average and you will be earning more sps than before less chests if you don't have the requirements and don't want to rent but more sps and this should increases in price now that will be some demand for it with this change.
  • If you are planning to sell out and leave: it will be wisely to wait some time after this change so your sps and maybe others assets goes up in price.

Definitely sps stacking should be crazy amount to gain higher than 100% rewards but I think most of the drama could be avoided if the numbers not increases so much when you want just the 100%, players are always feeling that his rewards are getting nerf, but we will see if it was the right move or not.



0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar

Congratulations @caimanx! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You published more than 50 posts.
Your next target is to reach 60 posts.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Check out our last posts:

LEO Power Up Day - May 15, 2023
The Hive Gamification Proposal
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
0
0
0.000
avatar

What’s the source? This sounds like a bad plan. Cards are expensive already and now this?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Source is the previous townhall, the video one. We need an actual use for the SPS if we want to increases his value, making so high numbers of SPS requirement for 100% is not the best idea even if all turn quite well for sps price lots of players has got pretty annoying feeling that their rewards has been nerfed again. But that just for chests, the SPS per battle for the avarage human should be higher and/or more value overall once this change is implement, less chests but more income and we can even get a lot more chests than before by renting toncs of SPS but more likely will not be profitable to do that.

Posted using Splintertalk

0
0
0.000
avatar

I see. Thank you.

It is already not profitable since cards and potions have no value.

Not even talking about the time spent…

0
0
0.000