Blockchain Projects & Hive : Growth Factor Revolves In Active Transactions Most

Each one of us have our own plan to succeed in the realm of crypto and it seems to me that there is going to be a very positive future coming ahead for those who knows how to play their cards. When I look at the short rugged history that has created many hypes, newer adoptions,market prices that grew higher with time, new blockchains came forth and the mining sector got new shape, each time because the user's interest have been changing. The value upon which many coins rely, that depended on what sorts of activities are put on a chain that mattered most.

I wonder why the total volume of #BTC number always have to be the same as 21 million and why not more than that. Since the number is fixed and people have been attracted to the price and pump it went through, starting frome the day back in 2010 when the price of one coin was restricted to just 40 cents in the beginning, right from that time to after 1.5 decades time passed on, now each one of the coin have $35k price value. What actually gave it such high price?

The price surely grew with market volume fluctuating from time to time. It is not just the technology that has given the value to rise, but the continual projection of people to complete their activities, sum of calculations, text generated ideas, sharing of ideas,adding real values as per each cycle, making a good base of the blocks to store the vital information in each channel, that has helped the chains of every layer of the coin, upon which the value relied.

Source

What I personally believe is if people constructively stick to the building process of something, if energy and time is put forth and the projection rolls forward , then if it be a blockchain or the network protocol - value would be added. The primal valuation of the crypto tokens at their infancy was very low and even poker tools were costlier than some hundreds of these. But, essentially those coins gathered in the scheme of activities and exchanges.

One thing is, if one user could appoint another with a single task of "completing a math/puzzle ", if that sum takes 5 minutes of time and the merit based on completing the task took some value - then that would require a pricing. If the economic value of the single task gets to $0.5 and the tokenized currency could be in exchanged equal to the net value of exchange, then things are just the same as conversion rates. Thats how the tokens start to gather value and it all had to come down to the factors of people's participations .

#Hive price for example, went through massive changes and sometimes in its peak,the ATH of $3.41 and also down to 20 cents from time to time. This platform being a blockchain structure also conform a solid baseline of protocols. Back in the 5 years ago,there were just a few thousands of active users and now the number would surpass a few millions. What that says is, as far as the activities of people increase and they start adding value to the blocks,thats when price fluctuate from time to time.

I heard some of the people to say that why some of the accounts with lower contribution to one chain has more holding value and others not. Its such a question I review in a sense that, with greater reliability in the block's activation, with storage of larger transaction base, thats how influence gets over. Certain "following" number in that case helps the idea to better demonstrate.
But, when it comes to growth,block transactions matter most and within a few years of time in the future, things would change even more and I am looking forward to see that for Hive also.

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha